Pt. III

Been a while since I posted from The Shaping of Things to Come. Here is a bit of a summary of recent reading:


Expanding on the INCARNATIONAL approach.

2 Cor 5:19 ...God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself...
Those who seek God will now find him in Jesus the man.

Couple of thoughts now on evangelism (p 44): Jesus commented to his disciples that he would make them fishers of men. Not only was he using words and concepts that the disciples understood but he was hinting at the missional community which was to come.
Fishing rods versus nets. We think of it as going out, casting out our line and with the right bait, the right words, the right church program, the right lingo, the right moment, someone will bite the hook. Its a one on one affair. "If everyone does their bit and gets a couple of friends saved and then into the church, we will be fulfilling Jesus' mandate."
In turn, Jesus wasn't referring to poles and bait but rather nets. They fished with nets, they went out, dragged their net about and then went back to shore, taking with them whatever had been caught in the net. The real key then was not studying the currents, tides and all the other technical details (though it is not unhelpful) but the strength of the nets! If the nets were strong and clean, their would be a catch. Note, they spent more time mending and cleaning their nets than actually out on the water.
Frost sees this image relating to us today in that "instead of adopting a stance that requires a Christian to leave a sacred zone to go and fish for an individual to return with him to that zone (church building), it releases the church to see its 'fishing' as a more relational exercise. If the disciples spent so much time on their nets to ensure a catch, what might those nets be for us today? We propose that the web of relationships, friendships, and acquaintances that Christians normally have makes up the net into which not-yet Christians will swim. This means that the missional-incarnational church will spend more time on building friendships than it will on developing religious programs."

Following that up he quotes:
"But no thought is given to establish what church members are already doing in their neighborhood and places of work. No attempt is made, for example, to identify the medical practitioner who has changed the approach to patients by providing counseling and practical support rather than just curative care. No attempt is made to identify the local (public official) in the congregation who is tackling certain important quality of life and social issues in the community. No attempt is made to support the lady who is conducting an informal neighborhood bible study group. No attempt is made to support prayerfully the teacher who has just started work in an inner-city school with many pupils from broken families. And no attempt is made to see ones family's care for their disabled child as a ministry worthy of the church's support and prayers."
More than that, we don't see businessmen, students, youth workers, lecturers, plumbers, electricians, and homemakers as having missional roles in their worlds... We don't see the strong creation of friendships that parents make through the local school as being anything to do with mission (unless they're inviting them to church). We can't see the regular gathering of *whatever group* as part of the net that catches people into the kingdom of God.



*all thoughts taken from The Shaping of Things to Come*